Marilyn Childs vs. Roane County Board of Education, et al.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE FILED EASTERN SECTI ON April 24, 1996 M ARI LYN CHI LDS, Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt , v. ROANE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATI ON, ET AL. , De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. C/ A NO. 03A01-Appellate C ourt Clerk 9512- CH- 00431 ROANE CHANCERY HON. W LLI AM E. LANTRI P, I CHANCELLOR AFFI RM ED AND REM ANDED DAVI D A. STUART, STUART & VAN RI PER, Cl i nt on, f or Pl a i nt i f f Ap p e l l a nt . ROBERT G. W HEELER, J R. , a nd CHARLES W CAGLE, LEW S, KI NG, . I KRI EG, W ALDROP & CATRON, Na s hvi l l e , a nd J . SCOTT M CLUEN, c Ha r r i ma n, f or De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s . O P I N I O N Fr a nks . J . The Roa ne Count y Boa r d of Educ a t i on ( Boa r d) d i s mi s s e d pl a i nt i f f f r om he r pos i t i on a s a t e nur e d t e a c he r , a n d s he br ought t hi s a c t i on c l a i mi ng t he Boa r d vi ol a t e d t he Te a c he r Te nur e Ac t i n t ha t t he Boa r d s de c i s i on wa s a r bi t r a r y a n d c a pr i c i ous a nd t ha t he r di s mi s s a l di d not c ompor t wi t h d u e pr oc e s s . The Cha nc e l l or de t e r mi ne d t he e vi de nc e s uppor t e d t h e Bo a r d s f i ndi ngs t ha t Pl a i nt i f f ha d c ommi t t e d a c t s whi c h d e mo n s t r a t e d i ne f f i c i e nc y, i nc ompe t e nc e , ne gl e c t of dut y, a n d i n s u b o r di na t i on. He a l s o de t e r mi ne d t ha t t he he a r i ngs , he l d i n t h r e e s e s s i ons , s a t i s f i e d t he r e qui r e me nt s of t he Te a c he r Te n u r e Ac t a nd me t due pr oc e s s s t a nda r ds . Pl a i nt i f f h a s a ppe a l e d, i n s i s t i ng t he Boa r d s d e c i s i on wa s a r bi t r a r y a nd c a pr i c i ous . Cour t s a r e r e l uc t a nt t o s ubs t i t ut e t he i r j udgme nt f o r t h a t of a s c hool boa r d whe r e i t s e xe r c i s e of j udgme nt d o e s n o t vi ol a t e t he l a w. St a t e e x r e l . Thomps on v . W k e r , 845 al S. W 2 d 752 ( Te nn. App. 19 92) . . I t i s pr e s ume d t ha t a c t i ons of a b o a r d a r e not a r bi t r a r y a nd c a pr i c i ous , but a r e r e a s ona bl e u n l e s s t he r e i s c l e a r e vi de nc e t o t he c ont r a r y. M t c he l l v . i Ga r r e t t , 510 S. W 2d 894, 898 ( Te nn. 1974) . . The r e c or d i s r e pl e t e wi t h t e s t i mony t ha t pl a i nt i f f wa s u n a bl e t o c ont r ol he r c l a s s r oom, ma i nt a i ne d que s t i ona bl e me t h o d s f or de t e r mi ni ng s t ude nt s gr a de s , a nd r e qui r e d e x t r a o r di na r y a s s i s t a nc e f r om s c hool a dmi ni s t r a t or s a nd p a r e n t s t o e nf or c e di s c i pl i ne . Gi ve n t hi s e vi de nc e , t he Bo a r d s f i ndi ng t ha t pl a i nt i f f s i nc ompe t e nc e , i ne f f i c i e nc y , i n s u b o r di na t i on, a nd ne gl e c t of dut y wa r r a nt e d he r di s mi s s a l , wa s n o t a r bi t r a r y a nd c a pr i c i ous . Fol l owi ng t he t r i a l be f or e t he Cha nc e l l or , p l a i nt i f f s o u g h t l e a ve t o a me nd he r pl e a di ngs t o c ha r ge t he vi ol a t i on o f a p o l i c y of t he Roa ne Count y Boa r d of Educ a t i on, whi c h r e q u i r e d t he Sc hool Supe r i nt e nde nt t o pr ovi de a t e nur e d t e a c h e r wi t h a dva nc e d wr i t t e n wa r ni ng pr i or t o di s mi s s a l f r o m e mp l o y me nt . The Tr i a l Cour t ove r r ul e d t he mot i on whi c h 2 p l a i nt i f f i ns i s t s wa s e r r one ous . Pl a i nt i f f a r gue s t ha t t he i s s u e of not i c e by t he s upe r i nt e nde nt , a s r e qui r e d by c ount y p o l i c y, wa s t r i e d by i mpl i e d c ons e nt , a nd t he Tr i a l Cour t s h o u l d ha ve a l l owe d a me ndme nt of t he c ompl a i nt t o i nc l ude t h i s i s s u e , c i t i ng T. R. C. P. 1 5. 02. 1 The Cha nc e l l or s t a t e d t ha t he di d not a l l ow t he a me nd me nt b e c a us e ?f ur t he r a me ndme nt i s unne c e s s a r y. The c o mp l a i nt a l r e a dy s e t s f or t h i n br oa d t e r ms a l l e ga t i ons whi c h s t a t e a c a us e of a c t i on unde r t he s t a t ut e gove r ni ng r e vi e w. ? Th e l a ngua ge of t he c omp l a i nt a l l e ge s s t a t ut or y a nd c o n s t i t ut i ona l vi ol a t i on s ge ne r a l l y a nd t he n goe s on t o s p e c i f y s e ve r a l c ha r ge s . The c ons t i t ut i ona l vi ol a t i ons a l l e g e d i nc l ude due pr o c e s s de pr i va t i ons . Tr i a l of a n i s s ue by i mpl i e d c ons e nt wi l l be f oun d wh e n a pa r t y oppos e d t o t he mot i on kne w or s houl d r e a s ona bl y h a v e k nown of t he e vi de nc e r e l a t i ng t o t he ne w i s s ue , di d no t o b j e c t t o t hi s e vi de nc e , a nd wa s not pr e j udi c e d t he r e by. Zac k Ch e e k Bui l de r s , I nc . V. M Le od, 597 S. W 2d 888 ( Te nn. 1980) . c . He r e t he Pol i c i e s of t h e Roane Count y Boar d of Educ at i on wa s i n t r o d uc e d i nt o e vi de nc e dur i ng t he t r i a l . Howe ve r , i t wa s i n t r o d uc e d i n t he c ont e xt of a di s c us s i on of di s c r e pa nc i e s i n Ap p e l l a nt s pe r s onne l f i l e a nd c ont r a c t pr ovi s i ons s e t t i ng o u t g r i e v a nc e pr oc e dur e s . The r e c or d doe s not s how t ha t t he i s s u e o f a l a c k of wr i t t e n wa r ni ng by t he s upe r i nt e nde nt wa s r a i s e d a t a ny t i me i n t he he a r i ngs . Ha d t he i s s ue be e n c l e a r l y 1 W e n i s s ue s n ot r a i s e d by t he pl e a di ngs h c ons e n t of t he pa r t i e s , t he y s h a l l be t r ha d be e n r a i s e d i n t he pl e a di ngs . Su c h ma y b e n e c e s s a r y t o c a u s e t h e m t o c o n f o r t h e s e i s s u e s ma y b e ma d e u p o n mo t i o n o f a f t e r j u d g me n t ; b u t f a i l u r e s o t o a me n d t he t r i a l of t he s e i s s ue s . 3 a r e t r i e d b y e x p r e s s o r i mp l i e d e a t e d i n a l l r e s p e c t s a s i f t he y a me n d me n t o f t h e p l e a d i n g s a s m t o t he e vi de nc e a nd t o r a i s e a n y p a r t y a t a n y t i me , e v e n does not af f e c t t he r e s ul t of r a i s e d or e ve n me nt i one d, a ddi t i ona l t e s t i mony mi ght ha ve b e e n e l i c i t e d f r om t he s upe r i nt e nde nt t o de a l wi t h t hi s i s s ue . Th e Bo a r d c oul d not ha ve r e a s ona bl y known t ha t t he pol i c y v i o l a t i on wa s be i ng r a i s e d a nd t he a me ndme nt s houl d not be b a s e d on t hos e gr ounds . Se e Lapr ay v . Smi t h, 804 S. W 2d 87 . ( Te n n . App. 1990) . Howe ve r , t he Cha nc e l l or s f i ndi ng t ha t t h e v a g u e l y wor de d c ompl a i nt r a i s i ng due pr oc e s s i s s ue s s uf f i c e d t o r a i s e t he vi ol a t i on o f t he Boa r d s pol i c y i s a ppr opr i a t e u n d e r t he c i r c ums t a nc e s of t hi s c a s e . Pl a i nt i f f s t r e nuous l y i ns i s t s t ha t t he Boa r d s a c t i o n wa s a de ni a l of he r due pr oc e s s r i ght s . The pol i c y o f t h e Ro a ne Count y Boa r d o f Educ a t i on Ar t . I V. §C( 16) , p. 305, 1 9 7 5 , r e qui r e s t ha t : Any t i me t he pe r f or ma nc e of a n e mpl oye e ha s r e a c he d t he l e ve l c ons i de r e d uns a t i s f a c t or y a nd whi c h c ou l d l e a d t o d i s mi s s a l , t h e s upe r i nt e nde nt s ha l l i s s ue a wr i t t e n wa r ni ng t o t he e mpl oye e i nvol ve d. Af t e r wa r ni ng i s gi ve n, t he e mpl oye e s ha l l be gi ve n a r e a s ona bl e t i me t o i mpr ove hi s [ s i c ] pe r f or ma nc e . The Boa r d c onc e de s t ha t s uc h not i c e wa s not gi ve n . Th e r e c or d s hows t ha t t he onl y wr i t t e n not i c e Appe l l a nt r e c e i v e d f r om t he s upe r i nt e nde nt of s c hool s wa s a l e t t e r da t e d Au g u s t 28, 1992, i nf or mi ng he r of t he c ha r ge s t o be c ons i de r e d b y t h e Boa r d of Educ a t i on a nd he r r i ght s unde r t he di s mi s s a l p r o c e d ur e s of t he Te a c he r Te nur e l a w, ( T. C. A. § 49- 5- 511) . The r e c a n b e l i t t l e doubt t ha t f a i l ur e t o f ol l ow p o l i c y c a n be a due pr o c e s s vi ol a t i on. Se e Vi t ar e l l i v . S e a t o n , 359 U. S. 535, 79 S. Ct . 963, 3 L. Ed. 2d 1012 ( 1959) . 1959) . ( Se c r e t a r y of I nt e r i or wa s bound by r e gul a t i ons whi c h h e h a d pr omul ga t e d f or di s mi s s a l s on gr ounds of s e c ur i t y, e v e n t h o u g h he woul d not ha v e ha d t o c ompl y wi t h s uc h gui de l i ne s i f 4 h e h a d pr oc e e de d a ga i ns t t he e mpl oye e on di f f e r e nt gr ounds ) . Ho we v e r , i t i s i mpor t a nt t o not e t ha t Vi t ar e l l i di d not n e c e s s a r i l y r e qui r e s t r i c t a dhe r e nc e t o t he a ddi t i ona l d i s mi s s a l pol i c y. The Cour t f ound t ha t t he di s mi s s a l i n t ha t c a s e wa s v oi d b e c a us e t he pr oc e e di ngs f e l l ?s ubs t a nt i a l l y s h o r t of r e qui r e me nt s ?. At 9 7 5 . Vi t ar e l l i , 359 U. S. At 544, 79 S. Ct . The Roa ne Count y Boa r d of Educ a t i on wa s bound by i t s p o l i c y, b ut we c onc l ude i t s ubs t a nt i a l l y c ompl i e d wi t h i t s p o l i c y. The a c t i ons of t he pr i nc i pa l s ubs t a nt i a l l y s e r ve d t h e p u r pos e s be hi nd t he Count y pol i c y, by r e pe a t e d wa r ni ngs a n d t he a mount of t i me gi ve n f or i mpr ove me nt . Pl a i nt i f f s t e s t i mony a t he r di s mi s s a l he a r i ng a n d wr i t t e n r e c or ds ke pt by t he pr i nc i pa l s how t ha t e a r l y i n t he s c ho o l y e a r p l a i nt i f f wa s ma de a wa r e t ha t he r j ob wa s i n j e o p a r dy. She t e s t i f i e d t ha t dur i ng he r s e c ond ye a r a t Ro c k wo od J uni or Hi gh, ?i n t he f a l l M . Thomps on be ga n t e l l i n g r me t h a t he c oul d not r e c omme nd me ba c k ne xt ye a r a nd t ha t I wo u l d not ha ve a j ob f or t he ne xt ye a r ?. She a l s o s t a t e d ?M . r Th o mp s on wa s ve r y ups e t wi t h me be c a us e my c l a s s r oom wa s n t b e i n g r un be t t e r , a nd he l e t me know t ha t on a da i l y ba s i s . ? Th e r e c or d s hows t ha t t he pr i nc i pa l ga ve pl a i nt i f f nume r ous wr i t t e n not i c e s of uns a t i s f a c t or y pe r f or ma nc e s a nd pr obl e ms . Th e s e wa r ni ngs we r e ma d e ove r a pe r i od of mont hs , a nd r a i s e d n u me r ous c onc e r ns a bout pl a i nt i f f s pe r f or ma nc e . W c onc l u d e e t h e s e wa r ni ngs we r e s uf f i c i e nt l y nume r ous , s pe c i f i c , a nd s e r i o u s s o a s t o wa r n p l a i nt i f f t ha t s he ha d t o i mpr ove he r p e r f o r ma nc e or l os e he r pos i t i on. The s e not i c e s we r e gi ve n mo n t h s be f or e t he e nd of t he s c hool ye a r a nd ga ve Appe l l a nt 5 ?r e a s ona bl e t i me t o i mpr ove . ? Our Supr e me Co ur t ha s s a i d t ha t c our t s s houl d not i n t e r f e r e wi t h t he a c t i o n of a Boa r d of Educ a t i on on p r o c e d ur a l gr ounds e xc e p t i n ?t he c l e a r e s t c a s e of ma t e r i a l d i s r e g a r d by t he Boa r d of t he pr oc e dur a l r e qui r e me nt s of t he s t a t u t e [ t he Te a c he r Te nur e Ac t ] or a s howi ng of pr e j udi c e . ? Po t t s v . Gi bs on, 469 S. W 2d 130 ( Te nn. 1971) . . The r e qui r e me n t o f a s howi ng of pr e j udi c e ha s not be e n de ve l ope d f ur t he r by o u r c our t s . Howe ve r , t he ha r ml e s s e r r or s t a nda r d c ompor t s wi t h t he r e a s oni ng ot he r c our t s ha ve e mpl oye d i n de a l i ng wi t h d u e p r oc e s s r e qui r e me nt s . Se e Gi l be r t s on v . M Al i s t e r , 383 c F. Su p p . 1107 ( D. Conn. 1 974 ) ; 9 0 0 P. 2d 850( Ka n. App. 19 95) ; ( Ka n . 1 990) . W k e r v . Boar d of Educ at i on, al S t at e v . W t e , 785 P. 2d 950 hi M e ove r , a s t a t ut or y e r r or ma y be ha r ml e s s i f i t or d o e s not pr e j udi c e t he s ubs t a nt i ve r i ght s of a pa r t y. Tampl i n v . S t ar Lumbe r and Suppl y Co. , 836 P. 2d 1102 ( Ka n. 1992) . Pl a i nt i f f s t e s t i mony s hows t ha t pl a i nt i f f s uf f e r e d n o p r e j udi c e by t he Coun t y s f a i l ur e t o f ol l ow i t s r ul e t ha t wr i t t e n not i c e be i s s ue d by t he Supe r i nt e nde nt . She ha d a b u n d a nt not i c e , a t l e a s t s i x mont hs be f or e t he e nd of t he s c h o o l ye a r , t ha t he r wor k wa s not s a t i s f a c t or y a nd t ha t t h e s e p r o b l e ms woul d l e a d t o he r di s mi s s a l . The a ppa r e nt pur pos e o f t h e Co unt y pol i c y, t o c onve y t he t hr e a t of di s mi s s a l a nd t o g i v e t he t e a c he r r e a s on a bl e t i me t o c or r e c t t he s i t ua t i on, wa s s a t i s f i e d by t he pr i nc i pa l s wa r ni ngs . W c onc l ude t ha t e p l a i n t i f f wa s not pr e j u di c e d by t he l a c k of not i c e a nd f a i l u r e t o f o l l ow t he me nt i one d pol i c y c ons t i t ut e d ha r ml e s s e r r or . The p l a i nt i f f c ha r ge s ot he r i r r e gul a r i t i e s i n t he h e a r i n gs be f or e t he Boa r d, whi c h we ha ve c ons i de r e d a nd f i n d 6 t o b e wi t hout m r i t . e The j udgme nt of t he Tr i a l Cour t i s a f f i r me d, a nd t h e c a us e r e ma nde d wi t h t he c os t of t he a ppe a l a s s e s s e d t o t he a pp e l l a nt . ______________________ _ _ He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J . CONCUR: _ _ _ _ _ ___________________ ___ Ho u s t o n M Godda r d, P. J . . _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________ ___ Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J . 7

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.